SongTrellis
Music and Musical Know-how For You

Members
Join Now
Login

Home | How-Tos | Directory | Our Composers | The Rhythms | Play Rhythm | Rhythm Web | Tonematrix | Chord Grid | The Changes | Song Discussions | Public Ideas | SongTrellis Recommends... | Video Links | Great Performances | SongTrellis Music Editor | The Lessons | Jukebox | The Animations | Our Contributors | Latest Topics | Tunetext | Workscore Chord Entry | Chord Entry By Grid | Workscore Composer | Music Tool Lore | Harmonic Interval Palette | Harmony Projects | Search | Video Demonstrations | Playlists | What's a Songtrellis? | FAQ | Feedback

Author Steve Barkhurst
Posted 4/16/06; 9:26:14 PM
Topic I Love Paris and thank you
Msg# 4819 (in response to 4816)
Prev/Next 4818/4820
Reads 680

Chas... here's a response to your A-11 comment that:

"...when I construct this in full†, using my bass string for the root†A,† this chord†becomes a virtual††Ami11..."

Almost, but Ami11 wouldn't have Eb. And if we called it Ami11b5 to account for the Eb, that would still be incorrect, I think.

My old guy harmonic training recalls that the A-11 symbol (or Ami11) mandates inclusion of the 9 (B), and that wasn't my intention.

The D is actually a harmonic leftover... the major 7 of the previous Eb ma7.

Here's how the changes happen in my mind and left hand, or as I might voice it for a string section.

Notice that the Eb and G are constant. First, comes a simple triad. C-. It's followed by another triad, what I labeled B+ for convenience, but what I actually think of harmonically as C- with a flatted root (HERESY in the eyes of some, I kow). With Bbma7, a fourth voice is added, and a fifth voice joins in with my confusing A-7b5 (sus 4):

C-: C Eb G

B+: B D# F## (Cb Eb G)

Eb ma7/Bb: Bb D Eb G

A-7b5 (sus 4): A C D Eb G

As I recall from analyzing Bach in college, a leftover from a previous chord is a suspension... or is it an appogiatura? I'm a foggy fogey on that one.

As to the why: C, D and Eb are the first three pitches of the melody. As such, their re-stated vertical presence in my oddly described A-7b5 (sus 4) doesn't hurt my ear. In hindsight, I recall wanting to give the minor section density in preparation for major triadic release, i.e., to empower the simple C major triad to come. If I'd called it A-7b5 (add 11), I felt it would infer that the D should be added on top (A C Eb G D), and that would have made it too out front for me.

Also in hindsight, I can understand the confusion I caused... the "sus" instruction includes replacing the third with either 2 or 4. My bad.

For my edification, can you (or someone) suggest a more accurate shorthand way to describe my voicing of A C D Eb G for others?

Thanks,

Steve

blog comments powered by Disqus

Please join our community at SongTrellis. Our contributors welcome your comments, suggestions and requests. As soon as you join the site (or login if you are a member) a response form will appear here.




Last update: Sunday, April 16, 2006 at 9:30 PM.